Saturday, May 4, 2024
BusinessIndia

Time magazine calls Manmohan an underachiever

Dubbing Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as an “underachiever” the prestigious Time magazine asks whether the architect of 1991 economic reforms can rouse himself and put India back on the high growth path.

“Narrowing the gap between heightened expectations and the nation capacity to deliver, should be a job for the man who launched those expectations 21 years ago with such oratorical flourish,” Time says in the cover story of its Asia edition.

“India can only wait to see if Singh can rouse himself, let alone prevail or overcome,” wonders the cover story of the July 16 issue with the blurb: “The Underachiever. India needs a reboot. Is Prime Minister Manmohan Singh up to the job?

Tracing Manmohan Singh journey to the top from his remote farming village in Gah, now in northeast Pakistan, the magazine suggests that the 79-year-old prime minister today appears “unwilling to stick his neck out” on reforms that will put the country back on the growth path.

“Last quarter, India’s GDP growth fell to a nine-year low of 5.3 percent, a steep drop from 9.2 percent the same period last year and a worrying turn for a country that needs to stay on a high growth path to pull hundreds of millions out of poverty,” the magazine noted.

“With the rupee hitting record lows, a yawning fiscal deficit and a lack of economic direction from the government’s top brass, investors at home and abroad are beginning to get cold feet,” Time said.

Voters too are losing confidence, as rising inflation and a litany of scandals chip away at the government’s credibility, it said, citing a recent national poll suggesting that 66 percent of urbanites believed Singh and his coalition had lost the right to govern.

“How has India’s technocrat-in-chief fallen so far from grace,” wondered Time magazine, noting that during his first term, India’s economy reached a clip of 9.6 percent growth.

“Singh’s coalition passed laws to guarantee the right of rural Indians to work while improving civic rights and political transparency. In 2009, when the government was re-elected, the headlines trumpeted: SINGH IS KING!”

Asking whether Manmohan Singh was “Asleep at the Wheel”, Time said: “Business-friendly laws that could spur growth to offset that spending are languishing, and industry is struggling.”

Industry leaders are demanding a host of bold reforms, such as an end to expensive subsidies, deregulation of diesel prices and resumption of a law to allow multibrand retailers like Walmart into India, it noted.

Time suggested that “Singh has joined the public soul searching belatedly, and the electorate will let him know what it thinks of his performance in general elections scheduled for 2014”.

Meantime, other players in the Congress, most notably Rahul Gandhi, UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi’s son, are positioning themselves to take Singh’s place, the magazine said.

“The opposition BJP is also working out its internal power struggles and choosing a front man who can take the government back,” it said.

2 thoughts on “Time magazine calls Manmohan an underachiever

  • radhakrishna

    The problem with the press is that it seems to lack analytically approach. By saying that Dr.Manmohan Singh fathered the reforms shows the shallowness of analysis. Reform agenda was pending with the Government for a long time due to lack of political will. It was Late P.V.Narasimha Rao, the then Prime Minister embarked on reforms in a coalition Government . However the press does not credit him for the reforms. Dr. Singh lacks commitment to take the reform agenda forward, therefore blaming rthe coalition partners for Prime Minister Sigh’s failure is wrong.

    Reply
  • Ram Sekhar

    TIME has clearly identified the symptoms. The root of the problem though is completely something else.

    Sonia’s populist via NREGA and other sieve like welfare schemes are drawn by her advisors from the NAC and are the biggest drain on India’s treasury.

    NREGA scheme – 40.000 crores/year and is possible ONLY during the economic boom. Else, we cannot sustain it.

    Why can’t we use 10% of it, i.e. 4000 crores to kickstart educaional/scientific institutes in a big way???? They help grow future economy and keep sustaining the economic boom.

    China invested heavily in CleanTech because it is the future need of the entire world. Name one such initiative that the UPA govt undertook, that is so future oriented???

    Poor Manmohan Singh is only the scapegoat, the problem is Sonia.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.