Saturday, November 23, 2024
DelhiPoliticsTop News

CVC P J Thomas might go soon, suggest reports

The days or hours of tainted Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) P J Thomas as the chief corruption watchdog of the country might be numbered with political activities suggesting he might be asked to step down in the face of a gathering political storm that now reaches the doorsteps of the Prime Minister.

The controversy has snowballed into a major embarrassment for Prime Minister Manmohan Singh himself after Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Sushma Swaraj announced to move Supreme Court and prove that the government panel that included her and the Prime Minister was aware of the CVC’s tainted past before his appointment.

With the Supreme Court placing the issue on a fast burner, the government is said to be hoping that the CVC Thomas will spare it further embarrassment and file in his resignation.

According to an NDTV report, the CVC might step down on Friday itself.

On Thursday, the Prime Minister?s office once again found itself in a political cesspool as the BJP launched a renewed onslaught on the government challenging its submission before the Supreme Court on the appointment of the country?s graft watchdog as “untrue”.

Opposition leader Sushma Swaraj, fresh off her spat with the ruling parties over her foiled political rally in Kashmir on Republic Day, Thursday vowed to file an affidavit to the Supreme Court on the appointment of a tainted person as the Chief Vigilance Commissioner.

The BJP turned the heat on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, calling the submission of the government before the apex court as untrue.

Claiming that the government?s submission through Attorney General was “absolutely untrue”, the BJP leader said, ?I personally brought this to the notice of the Prime Minister and the Home Minister…now I have decided to file an affidavit before the Supreme Court.?

“We were raising it inside and outside Parliament so far. But now I will be a part of it (in the Supreme Court),” she said, adding that “I am accusing the Attorney General of misleading the court”.

Attorney General G E Vahanvati earlier denied allegations of misleading the Court.

Swaraj and her party have been protesting the appointment of Thomas as the country?s senior-most officer in charge of fighting corruption because of the slew of graft charges against him in the past.

Being the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, she was a member of the three-member committee that appointed Thomas, along with Home Minister P Chidambaram, headed by the Prime Minister.

BJP spokesperson and senior leader Ravi Shankar Prasad said that the government during the controversies never stated that they weren’t aware about the charges on Thomas which they said today in the Supreme Court.

He said his party colleague Sushma Swaraj had very clearly told the panel about the past cases on CVC and the issues stops at the door of the Prime Minister now.

A SC bench, headed by Chief Justice SH Kapadia, had earlier asked the government if the three-member panel, headed by the prime minister, was aware of the corruption case and prosecution sanction granted by Kerala government while appointing Thomas as the CVC.

Attorney General G E Vahanvati, appearing on behalf of the government, said that the government was not aware of these facts.

?It was not before the committee. The material pertaining to the sanction for prosecution under section 120 B of the Indian Penal Code was not before the committee. The bio-data did not reflect this aspect before the committee,? Vahanvati said.

The apex court bench, also comprising justices K S Radhakrishnan and Swantanter Kumar, had said: ?We are not going into the merits of the case. We want to know whether the material pertaining to charge sheet and the sanction were brought before the committee or not.

?We want to know whether relevant material was brought before the committee and whether these documents were brought were before it.

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) had challenged Thomas? appointment as the CVC pointing to an oil import case against him, though Thomas has pleaded innocence in an affidavit before the Supreme Court.

In 1991-92, Thomas, as the Food Secretary in Kerala, had allegedly allowed the import of Palmolein or edible oil from Malaysia at prices higher than the market rate.

He also allegedly covered up the 2G Spectrum allocation scam as the Telecom Secretary.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.